|
DEMANDING BRAIN: BETWEEN SHOULD AND SHOULDN’T |
|
|
|
DEMANDING BRAIN: BETWEEN SHOULD AND SHOULDN’T
Alexandru TIBA
Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
Abstract
Albert Ellis’ cognitive theory of emotions makes a major distinction between positive and negative demandingness and preferences, but up to now there is no scale that makes this distinction evident. The main goal of this study is to validate this distinction by showing that positive and negative evaluative beliefs are separately associated with two distinct motivational brain systems: the approach/withdrawal systems. Participants (N=46) were tested with a modified version of the ABS II scale, allowing the distinction between positive and negative evaluative beliefs; subsequently they completed the BIS/BAS scales (Carver & White, 1994). Results show that positive demandingness and irrationality, but not preferences, strongly correlate with approach system sensitivity (BAS scores), while negative demandingness and irrationality, but not preferences, strongly correlate with withdrawal system sensitivity (BIS scores). This study suggests that individuals tend to develop positive and negative demandingness depending on the approach/withdrawal motivational systems sensitivity. Implications for emotional reactions and therapy are also discussed.
Key words: approach/withdrawal motivational systems, REBT, demandingness, preferences
Pages: 43-51
|
